Practically it is not that difficult to learn to change frequency for mind. The main problem is social. For our existence we are dependent upon this society, and we relate instinctively and desperately to this society. We want to understand the others, and we want to be accepted by the others. We want to be one in the team.
So we accept the rules of the team, independently of which these rules are. Many subcultures have very strange rules.
Every group has its standard frequency range. From this frequency range all is seen and evaluated.
This is the problem. Most groups and societies do not accept frequency change. It is like treason. For example, if a group use to meet at the pub every week, it is like treason if one of the members suddenly abstains from drinking beer.
There are some groups who do work with frequencies. They are traditionally small minorities. Hopefully, they can unite globally these days, as communication improve.
Showing posts with label social roles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label social roles. Show all posts
Wednesday, July 29, 2009
Monday, July 27, 2009
Harmony and unity 2
In a world of unity, the ideal is not to throw out people but to find the best role for all within the unity. This can happen on different levels, where all have comparatively bad roles, or where all have the best possible roles.
What is a good role? It is difficult to say generally, as it depends on mind, and mind is individual and complex. What is good for one is bad for the other.
Traditionally, there were more people than good roles. This problem remains partly, but it is not as difficult as it used to be. Access to higher education has increased ten times - at least - the last 100 years. The number of company leaders, musicians, movie makers, media personalities and the like are comparatively higher than before.
We could arrange society so the demand for good roles gets even bigger. But it would mean some changes in the hierarchies, and that is a sensitive area.
So the progress towards a world where every individual can express his or her best ambitions is a bit slow.
But if we see the unity of the world, we will also see the harmony and thus also the ways to increase the harmony even more.
What is a good role? It is difficult to say generally, as it depends on mind, and mind is individual and complex. What is good for one is bad for the other.
Traditionally, there were more people than good roles. This problem remains partly, but it is not as difficult as it used to be. Access to higher education has increased ten times - at least - the last 100 years. The number of company leaders, musicians, movie makers, media personalities and the like are comparatively higher than before.
We could arrange society so the demand for good roles gets even bigger. But it would mean some changes in the hierarchies, and that is a sensitive area.
So the progress towards a world where every individual can express his or her best ambitions is a bit slow.
But if we see the unity of the world, we will also see the harmony and thus also the ways to increase the harmony even more.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
