Removing suffering

Easter is approaching, and the Christian Easter is in remembrance of Jesus Christ dying on the cross and later returning to life. The death of Jesus Christ is seen as a sacrificial offering for atoning for the sins of humanity.

The idea that the sins of one person can be taken away by another person seems to exist in most religions. But there are different opinions about the problem to be solved. Is it sin, suffering or the wrath of the Gods?

Shantideva, who was a scholar in the Buddhist tradition, is analysing the matter in Bodhicaryavatara. (Chapter 8, Meditation 101 - 108.) In Buddhism there is no sin, but suffering.

First he claims that suffering has no proper owner. Suffering belongs to no one.

This is different from the Christian tradition where sin always has an owner. By doing a sinful action, the individual becomes the owner of sin. But the suffering caused by the sinner hits another individual. This person might be without sin (in this case) but will nevertheless suffer the consequences.

Does this mean that the death of Jesus atones for the bad guy, but leaves the victim alone in the distress? The sins of the victim are also atoned for, but what about the suffering?

In the Buddhist tradition, the problem is suffering and not sin. Even if suffering has no owner it exists. It should be prevented and removed.

"If the suffering of one ends the suffering of many, then one who has compassion for others and himself must cause that suffering to arise." (8-105)

Those who have understood that the suffering of others is as important as the things they themselves hold dear "plunge down into the Avici hell as geese into a cluster of lotus blossoms" (107), Shantideva claims.

Maybe you could add that in order to plunge down voluntarily into the hell you should trust in having a remedy against the suffering of others. Which is the mechanism making it possible for one to take away the suffering of others?

The answer could be in the question of ownership. Removing suffering is the same as releasing the voluntary ownership of suffering adopted by those who suffer. The moment they realise they do not have to carry this burden, the suffering is gone.

Trust 2

Is the divine stronger than man? What will happen if we trust in the divine and men tries to destroy it?
The answer is that the divine is stronger on the level of mind. On the material level, man can be strong as destructive force.
Eventually, the futility of destruction will be obvious. So eventually the divine principles will win.
To keep to the divine while being attacked by men is not easy. It is a nuisance, and totally unnecessary. But common.
The strength of the divine is in the perfection of the ideas. It works. It is possible. The cost is low. We want the good ideas.
This is the positive aspect.
But there is a negative aspect as well. Mistakes are mistakes and have negative effects. It is not a matter of sin or punishment. It is bad management. A waste of resources. Inefficient methods.
On mind level, everything we do is processed over and over again. If we put in bad ideas here, they will infest in mind and give bad experiences later.
The suffering we experience is the result of earlier mistakes, and of negative actions done now by ourselves or others.
So the divine principles are stronger than man. negative actions will give negative effects. It is a natural process in mind.

No mistake

The difference between a mistake and a sin is that a mistake should be corrected but a sin should be punished. Punishment means to inflict suffering.
So sin is a mistake leading to more mistakes. This is bad. It is obvious.
Sin is a very popular idea. Few so old ideas are so popular.
Sin is founded on the idea of weak mind. As mind is weak, it needs the support of threat of punishment in order to do the right.
If mind was strong it would do the right by itself.
Traditionally, mind was weak for most people. Education was bad, access to knowledge was bad and temporary distraction was abundant and unavoidable.
Now the situation is different, and it is changing rapidly. The problem is not lack of information but too much information.
So the idea of sin and punishment is getting outdated. Instead we need communication and respect for knowledge.