Openness or secrecy?
Traditionally we have lived in natural lack of knowledge - the universe has been a mystery in general and in specifics. Now we approach a new phase in history, fast increased knowledge and great increase in the number of individuals with clear mind.
So we can make a choice between relying on secrecy or openness. Instinct would say: preserve some secrets. Rationality says: openness is best for all and for all times.
In a time of change - as the present one - we might need rules of transition. But the transition must be to openness.
Openness is the only guarantee for freedom. All evil powers in the world has thrived on lack of knowledge. Will new evil powers emerge? The threat is constant. The antidote is one: openness. Transparency, as it is called.
In the ordinary civil society, it is obvious that to avoid conflict and friction, we need openness about rules and obligations for all citizens.
The society is in development. During the process, the distribution of the good and the bad is a bit arbitrary. How to handle this and avoid unfairness and conflict? Openness is the only thing that works.
Sunday, July 5, 2009
Thought and name 2
Etiketter:
civil society,
clear mind,
freedom,
increased knowledge,
new phase in history,
openness,
secrecy,
transparency
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment